No Unvaccinated Need Apply

On Tuesday evening TV in late July 2021, Don Lemon casually exclaimed to his colleague Chris Cuomo,
“Don’t get the vaccine? You can’t go to the supermarket. Don’t have the vaccine? Can’t go to the ball game. Don’t have the vaccine? Can’t go to work. You don’t have a vaccine? Can’t come here, no shirt, no shoes, no service.”

It’s understandable that a couple of overpaid actors wouldn’t have a clue about International Human Rights Law, and why it’s no longer acceptable in society to discriminate in the way that Mr Lemon proposes, but it’s a serious issue when that kind of ignorance reaches the level of Presidents and Prime Ministers.

From Trudeau to Biden, and Macron to Morrison, Liberal leaders around the world seem intent on creating a two-tier class system, providing services and rights to those who have consented to participate in a medical intervention, and denying those same services and rights to those who have chosen not to participate in it.

So, for the benefit of those politicians, and TV’s talking heads, who desperately need to attend a Human Rights 101 class, here are some cold hard facts regarding International Human Rights Laws, Codes & Principles, which directly relate to discrimination, particularly in respect to medical interventions. These universally ratified International Bioethics and Human Rights Laws really need to be broadcast at the highest volume within the public domain, at a time that is becoming more and more reminiscent of those dark days of the 1930s and 1940s.

In other posts, specifics regarding such issues as, “is the Covid experimental?” (spoiler: yes, it is), “does The Nuremberg Code apply?” (spoiler: again, yes) are clarified, but for now, let’s assume, quite rightly, that all the following articles of International Human Rights Laws, Codes, and Principles are wholly relevant – lawfully, legally and morally – to the current situation, in relation to the ‘discrimination of the individual’ who decides not to take part in the medical intervention known as “the jab”, or otherwise deceptively referred to as the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ shot.

The one thing to remember is that if the individual does not care to defend themselves with these laws, which have been specifically designed to protect their sovereign rights, why should they expect anyone else to do so for them?

Be your own advocate, and the advocate for your family! Each individual human being – all 8 billion of them – has the power to change the world for the better – right now. Most of us just haven’t realised it yet. Are you awake? If so, it’s now the time that you need to fully wake up your neighbour too!

The following articles and clauses all relate, directly or indirectly, to the sovereign Human Rights of the individual, particularly in regards to any ‘discrimination of the individual’, and in relation to scientific and medical experimentation, intervention, research, and associated technologies.

These and many other relevant quotes of International Bioethics and Human Rights Law can be found at nuremberg2.com. The following is taken from the page ‘No Discrimination Permitted’.

“The person involved [participant in the experiment] should… be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”
The Nuremberg Code (1947) Article 1

“Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as… political or other opinion.”
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Article 2

“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person.”
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Article 3

“All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.”
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Article 7

“Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.”
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Article 21 (2)

“Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community.”
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Article 27 (1)

“Ethical issues raised by the rapid advances in science and their technological applications should be examined with due respect to the dignity of the human person and universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Preamble

“On the freedom of science and research, scientific and technological developments… such developments should always seek to promote the welfare of individuals, families… in the recognition of the dignity of the human person and universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Preamble

“Innovation and creativity, is necessary to humankind… but… it may not be invoked at the expense of human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Preamble

“All human beings, without distinction, should benefit from the same high ethical standards in medicine and life science research.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Preamble

“[This declaration aims] to… protect human rights, by ensuring… fundamental freedoms, consistent with international human rights law.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 2 (c)

“[This declaration aims] to recognize… the need for… research and developments to occur within the framework of ethical principles… and to respect human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 2 (d)

“Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 3 (1)

“The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 3 (2)

“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention… may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 6 (1)

“Scientific research… should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards… and international human rights law.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 6 (2)

“The privacy of the persons concerned and the confidentiality of their personal information should be respected… such information should not be used or disclosed for purposes other than those… consented to, consistent with international law, in particular international human rights law.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 9

“The fundamental equality of all human beings in dignity and rights is to be respected so that they are treated justly and equitably.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 10

“No individual or group should be discriminated against or stigmatized on any grounds, in violation of human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 11

“The importance of cultural diversity and pluralism should be given due regard. However, such considerations are not to be invoked to infringe upon human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 12

“Progress in science and technology should advance… elimination of the marginalization and the exclusion of persons on the basis of any grounds.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 14 (2d)

“Benefits should not constitute improper inducements to participate in research.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 15 (2)

“Independent, multidisciplinary and pluralist ethics committees should be established… in order to: assess the relevant ethical, legal, scientific and social issues related to research projects involving human beings.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 19 (a)

“Independent, multidisciplinary and pluralist ethics committees should be established… in order to: foster debate, education and public awareness of, and engagement in, bioethics.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 19 (d)

“States, public and private institutions… should endeavour to ensure that any activity within the scope of this Declaration… is consistent with the principles set out in this Declaration.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 21 (1)

“States should take all appropriate measures, whether of a legislative, administrative or other character, to give effect to the principles set out in this Declaration in accordance with international human rights law… supported by action in the spheres of education, training and public information.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 22 (1)

“States should encourage the establishment of independent, multidisciplinary and pluralist ethics committees.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 22 (2)

“To achieve a better understanding of the ethical implications of scientific and technological developments, in particular for young people, States should endeavour to foster bioethics education and training at all levels.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 23 (1)

“States should encourage the participation of… regional and national non governmental organizations in this endeavour.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 23 (2)

“States should foster… and encourage the free flow and sharing of scientific and technological knowledge.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 24 (1)

“States should respect and promote solidarity between and among… individuals, families, groups and communities.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 24 (3)

“Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any claim to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity.”
UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005) Article 28

Contact and challenge your political representatives and public service institutions.

Establish whether or not they support and adhere to International Bioethics and Human Rights Law.

Are they prepared to sign a declaration that publicly confirms their full adherence to
International Bioethics and Human Rights Laws?